Steve has been covering North American
thoroughbred racing for more than three
decades. He is a regular contributor to
Daily Racing Form's Simulcast Weekly. His
column will appear on Bodog.com in
this space each week.
A Handicapping Primer For Del Mar By The Sea
Early Trends on the Polytrack, Plus Trainers and Jockeys to Watch
A Column by Steve Davidowitz
July 25, 2007
Del Mar, California.
I spent the first week of racing at
Del Mar, one of America's most beautiful
racetracks. Built in the 1930s by Bing
Crosby and his Hollywood friends, Del
Mar's charm stems from extraordinary
Spanish-inspired architecture and the
Pacific Ocean, which is barely 500
yards away.
As if I needed an excuse to be here,
I came to get a firsthand glimpse of
the new synthetic Polytrack surface,
as well as to see the most improved turf
horse in America who is going to run
next in the Arlington Million on August
11.
While odds-on favorite After
Market was a dazzling winner
of the $400,000 Eddie
Read Handicap (G1) at nine furlongs
and public favorites were winning at
their customary 33 percent rate on
Polytrack, thousands of Del Mar horseplayers
were seen with question marks burrowed
in the furrowed brows of their foreheads.
As in: What in the blazes is going
on here???
And/or: How did THAT horse beat
such a good field at 65-1 when he couldn't
handle much cheaper in his last six
starts???
Polytrack is confusing to American horseplayers
because the vast majority of dirt performers
either improve dramatically or run much
slower on it than on traditional dirt.
Beyond that little problem, there doesn't
seem to be any correlation between horse
performance and different brands of synthetic
track - such as the Cushion Track that
was in play at Hollywood Park, or even
the version of Polytrack used by Keeneland
and/or Turfway Park in Kentucky, Woodbine
in Canada and Arlington Park in Chicago.
If anything, the only positive correlation
I saw at Del Mar was the way that turf
horses seemed to adapt well to the new
surface, just as they have adapted to
other synthetic surfaces.
The reason for this may be linked to
the 'kickback' factor, and I'm not referring
to any private payoffs being kicked back
from one horse owner or jockey to another.
The kickback of soil on a dirt track
can be quite a nasty experience for horses
caught in the middle of a dense pack.
Kickbacks can even resemble flying missiles
aimed at the faces of trailing horses.
If truth be told, most jockeys don't
enjoy being hit with one of these dirt
clods either.
On plain grass, there is very little
kickback - none in fact - unless you
count the divots that come fitted with
soft tufts of grass that invariably lessen
the impact on contact. On synthetic Polytrack
- and/or its various cousins - there
are divots, but they inevitably come
apart into thousand of specks of harmless
powder. Poof, it's gone with
the wind.
Another noticeable characteristic of
synthetic track racing is that it takes
a supremely fit racehorse to win over
it.
While some might call the surface "tiring," that
doesn't explain the number of front runners
and pace pressers who were winning the
majority of Del Mar's sprint races during
the first six racing days through Monday
July 21. Nor will it explain why Polytrack
races beyond one mile were being won
by the strongest finishers in the field.
As I saw it, the sprinters that were
winning on or near the pace had either
gained strong conditioning via their
most recent races and workouts, especially
longer workouts, or races in which they
came up a bit short and were now fit
and ready to move forward in their initial
Del Mar race. The stretch-running winners
at one mile or more also seemed to share
some common denominators: They had proven
good form at longer distances and/or
an extended series of long workouts.
Because the race clockings tended to
be at least one full second slower per
class level than traditional dirt tracks,
I would expect horses that come out to
race over the Polytrack early in the
meet will improve significantly in their
second and third outings on this synthetic
surface. I also expect more turf horses
to jump into Polytrack races with some
success.
In addition to that overview, I would
give an extra long look at horses from
the barns of trainers who got off to
a very quick start in this meet. This
would suggest extra preparation that
is paying off. Yet, I would also include
a few trainers who aren't listed among
the top10.
Del Mar trainer standings
during the first six days of racing:
| Trainer |
Starts |
Wins |
2nds |
3rds |
Win |
%In the Money% |
| Peter Miller |
6 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
67 |
67 |
| Robert Frankel |
8 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
38 |
63 |
| Doug O'Neill |
19 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
11 |
42 |
| Mike Mitchell |
10 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
60 |
| Art Sherman |
11 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
18 |
45 |
| Vladimir Cerin |
8 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
25 |
63 |
| Barry Abrams |
4 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
50 |
100 |
| Craig Dollase |
5 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
40 |
60 |
| John Shirreffs |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
100 |
| Darrell Vienna |
6 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
17 |
50 |
* Peter Miller, a low-profile, high
percentage horseman, won with four of
his first six Del Mar starters, all of
whom trained 100 miles from Del Mar.
* Vladimir Cerin's entire barn looked
good in training drills and my guess
is that he will probably win a high percentage
of his second- and third-time starters
over the course.
* Brian Koriner, who isn't on the above
list, has pointed for this meeting where
he did so well in 2006. Koriner did win
a maiden sprint with Barbecue
Eddie on Saturday, July 21 after
giving that horse a prep race at Hollywood
prior to the start of this meeting.
* Bob Baffert isn't on the above list
either, after being the Del Mar meet
leader many different seasons during
the past dozen years. Baffert's precocious
two-year-olds, however, seemed more advanced
than they were at Hollywood Park.
* Doug O'Neill, who has a poor win percentage
so far, nevertheless is showing signs
of coming out of a long slump with aggressive
training drills at longer than usual
distances.
As for players who prefer to follow
jockeys, I would take a very close look
at any horses being ridden by Joe Talamo,
Michael Baze, Corey Nakatani, Victor
Espinoza and the young apprentice Alonso
Quinonez.
Del Mar jockey standings
during the first six days of racing:
| Jockey |
Starts |
Wins |
2nds |
3rds |
Win% |
%In the Money% |
| Michael Baze |
35 |
8 |
5 |
9 |
23% |
63% |
| Victor Espinoza |
27 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
22 |
44 |
| Joseph Talamo |
35 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
14 |
37 |
| Corey Nakatani |
17 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
29 |
41 |
| Alonso Quinonez |
12 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
25 |
50 |
* Joseph Talamo, no longer an apprentice,
struggled a bit the first few days, but
put it all together late in the first
week. At the bottom line, he is one of
the most polished teenage riders I have
seen since Steve Cauthen in the 1970s.
* Michael Baze, in his early 20's, is
one of the most versatile, most complete
young jockeys in America. He can handle
any type of horse at any distance on
any surface and already won his first
two Grade 1 stakes and was in perfect
synch with the Polytrack surface during
week one.
* Corey Nakatani and Victor Espinoza,
who are just a cut below the Hall of
Fame level, have patient riding styles
which plays well on the Polytrack as
well as on the turf.
* Alonso Quinonez, an apprentice who
challenged Julien Leparoux for the riding
title at Turfway Park in Kentucky this
year, has already scored on a pair of
extreme longshots at Del Mar. Quinonez
does lack turf racing experience, but
he seems to be a quick study who can
make all the needed adjustments within
a few weeks.
Next week's column will be a similar
handicapping primer on Saratoga racing,
which opens its 139th race meet on Wednesday,
July 25 for 36 racing dates through Labor
Day, September 3. Saratoga will have
at least one stakes race every day and
will offer more than $770,000 in daily
purses. Del Mar, which opened Wednesday,
July 16, will offer 43 racing dates through
Wednesday, September 5 and purses are
projected to approach Saratoga's daily
average.
Steve Davidowitz has been covering major
American stakes for more than three decades.
He is the author of the seminal handicapping
book, Betting Thoroughbreds (Dutton/Plume),
first published in 1977 and substantially
expanded and updated in 1997. Steve is
also a regular contributor to Daily Racing
Form's Simulcast Weekly and DRF Plus
and is the author of the recently released,
highly acclaimed book, The Best and Worst
of Thoroughbred Racing (DRF Press), a
collection of historical lists and essays
about every facet of the American racing
game. His columns will appear on Bodog.com
in this space each week.
More
Archived Horse Racing Articles >>
|